This ammo is loaded to SUBSONIC speeds for barrels from 10 to about 22 barrels. Once-fired LC brass, Hornady 55 grain SP (soft point) 1030 fps. It is intended ONLY for barrels up to 14ВЅ'.it occasionally sticks in the barrel of a 16' carbine. Our top selling 223/5.56 SUBSONIC round (priced per 100 rounds). This uses the same 100grn bullet but uses 8grns of powder and a small foam filler. Powder (25grns) looks like Vihavouri.Д®S also produce a round that will not cycle the action- different folks like different things. Accuracy is adequate for it's intended mission out to 100m or so.Д«ullet is filled with Tungsten carbide- so not cheep. Has cycled reliably in all the rifles I have tried it in- 1960's vintage M16, Current M4, HK 416 and ruger Mini 14.Д«ullet (on the new stuff) weighs 100grns (old was 127grn) which is marginal on stability. Out of 16' barrels like our test HK 416's.it is often just supersonic (1180fps) but a few civi spec 16 barrels it stays just below the speed of sound. It is designed to be subsonic in a mil spec 14ВЅ' barrel- it is. I also feel 700 ft lb at the muzzle is about the max you can shoot rabbits with and it still being worthwhile picking them up and you can also kill foxes to all the normal ranges and crows effectively, why not just try for a 40 grain jacketed round like a v-max traveling 2500- 2800 fps? That way you get increased barrel life, less recoil, easier moderation and only then need a 50 grain or over 1000 ft lb load for deer (one recorded zero change between the two loads).It works as advertised within a narrow window. 22 rifle for and the cost availability of the ammo renders the rest a dangerous waste of time IMO. When it comes to 40 grain subsonic the price you can buy a. Subsonic is pushing it too much with a 40 grain bullet (most sub CF loads use a heavier than usual bullet for calibre). 22 hornet power levels safely and accurately. It just seems that there is the possibility of two guns in one, depending on load. 223 should not fire a 40gr bullet at, say, 1100fps very quietly and with comparable accuracy to. Is there any practical reason why a moderated. 223 subsonic round that will fully function a military M4 and/or commercial developed AR-15s.

17hmr as it should be possible to create loads that replace both of those calibres. While daydreaming a bit with a glass of wine in the sun, I was thinking that, at least in theory, the.

223 and despite earlier expectations, I will reload from day one. With a need to control Muntjac and Fox I will shortly be getting a. I have many years experience of rimfire but nothing useful with centrefire and reloading. Oh I see hours (days.) of new challenges ahead of me. Taking a friend to carry the second rifle - yes, I like that, but normally find shooting with someone else is a hindrance at night, although of course Muntjac at night is illegal.

17hmr for more predictable work.ДЄ cast lead bullet sound interesting, one web site suggested putting the bullet in backwards to improve accuracy. 223 at 50 yards, is still edible.Д¬ost is not too much of an issue, I still have the. Maybe when I get out there and shoot something I may find that a rabbit, head shot with a 55gr. 22lr or hmr I will see fox and Muntjac and if I take the. I do not have any useful first hand experience of either but look forward to a few fun hours experimenting. 223 for that, from time to time, while at the same time carrying the more normal 55gr 3100 ft load for fox and Muntjac in case I am lucky to see any. Most of the time I am shooting rabbits and often at. My slightly twisted logic was that I could go out with one rifle but two (or three) loads. Minimum bullet weight for Munties is 50gn! 224 bullet you could not achieve that sub-sonically The minimum muzzle energy is 1000ft/lb and with even the heaviest. It would be illegal to shoot Mutjac with a subsonic.

Subsonic 223 ammo